Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. and Cryvenix Market Investigation: 300% Return Guarantee and Investor Warning
Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. and Cryvenix Market have been named in an official investor warning issued by the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) on July 31, 2026.
The warning concerns a purported investment research institution called Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. and a cryptocurrency trading platform known as Cryvenix Market.
According to the regulator, the two organizations promoted an investment arrangement involving trading signals, a claimed 300% return, and a performance fee calculated from purported profits.
Washington DFI also identified discrepancies between Zerivian’s claimed operating history and its corporate filings. Separately, the regulator questioned the significance of regulatory documents associated with Cryvenix, including an SEC Form D filing and a FinCEN money services business registration.
These findings raise important questions about the legitimacy of the advertised investment arrangement.
Washington DFI cautions that the underlying complaint allegations and reported losses have not been independently verified. Its public warning does not establish that the named organizations have been convicted of fraud.
This Cyb3rsect report examines the official warning, the companies’ claimed credentials, the promised investment returns, and the evidence investors should preserve.
What Are Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. and Cryvenix Market?
Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. presented itself as a professional investment research institution.
Cryvenix Market was described as a cryptocurrency trading platform associated with Zerivian.
According to Washington DFI, the organizations used the following domains:
Zerivian Guild Club Ltd.
- Zerivianguildclub.com
Cryvenix Market
- Cryvenixmarket.com
The regulator reports that these websites were created in September and November 2025, respectively.
This was inconsistent with claims suggesting that the businesses had operated for many years.
DFI also reported that both websites were inactive when its July 2026 warning was published.
The relationship between the organizations was presented as a division of responsibilities: Zerivian would supply investment research and trading signals, while Cryvenix would provide the trading platform where investors supposedly executed those signals.
That structure is central to understanding the complaint.
Washington State’s Official Investor Warning
On July 31, 2026, Washington DFI published an alert titled Alleged cryptocurrency trading platform Cryvenix Market and Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. may be fraudulent.
The regulator identified the subjects as Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. and CryvenixMarket.
The complaint was categorized under cryptocurrency scams and pig-butchering scams.
The warning focused on the companies’ business claims, registration documents, promised investment returns, and the apparent absence of verifiable trading profits.
Unlike some other investment complaints, the public alert does not provide a specific verified loss amount or a transaction-by-transaction account of an individual investor’s deposits.
That limitation matters.
It would be misleading to invent an investor’s personal experience, cryptocurrency wallet addresses, or financial loss when those details are not included in the public record.
Zerivian’s Claimed Operating History
One of the most significant findings concerns the corporate history of Zerivian Guild Club Ltd.
According to Washington DFI, Zerivian claimed to have operated since 2018.
However, the regulator reviewed records filed with the Washington Secretary of State and identified a different timeline.
The original company was incorporated in 2020 under the name OSIRF TRADE INC.
OSIRF was administratively dissolved in 2022.
The filing was subsequently reinstated and amended in October 2025 under the name Zerivian Guild Club Ltd.
This timeline does not support an uninterrupted operating history beginning in 2018.
A company may legitimately change its name or reinstate its registration. Such events are not, by themselves, proof of fraud.
The concern arises when marketing claims about the age or experience of an investment organization do not align with its documented corporate history.
Investors should verify these claims independently rather than relying solely on a company’s website.
Why Company Registration Does Not Prove Investment Legitimacy
The Zerivian case illustrates an important distinction between corporate registration and authorization to provide financial services.
A business may appear in a Secretary of State database because it has filed organizational documents.
That does not automatically mean it is licensed to advise investors, operate a cryptocurrency exchange, or offer particular securities.
Corporate records establish information about a registered entity, but they do not independently verify every statement the business makes about its operations.
In this case, Washington DFI used the registration history to examine Zerivian’s claimed operating timeline.
The discrepancy was relevant because the organization presented itself as an experienced investment research institution.
Investors should evaluate the company’s legal identity, regulatory status, business activities, and actual financial services separately.
Cryvenix Market’s Claimed New York Operations
Washington DFI reported that Cryvenix claimed to operate in New York.
The regulator examined whether Cryvenix appeared in records maintained by the New York State Department of Financial Services.
According to the alert, Cryvenix was not listed as a regulated entity by that department and did not appear to possess a BitLicense.
DFI noted that such authorization would be required under New York law for a custodial virtual currency exchange operating there.
The applicable licensing requirements depend on the actual business model and activities performed.
Nevertheless, a platform claiming to operate a cryptocurrency exchange in New York should be able to provide verifiable information about its legal entity and regulatory authorization.
An address on a website or a claim of U.S. operations is not a substitute for that verification.
The SEC Form D Filing: What It Actually Means
Washington DFI also reported that Cryvenix filed a Form D Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
An SEC Form D is a notice filing associated with certain securities offerings that rely on exemptions from registration.
It is not equivalent to an SEC license or approval of an investment business.
The information contained in Form D filings is generally submitted by the filer and is not independently verified by the SEC as an endorsement of the company.
This distinction matters because an investment promoter may present an official-looking SEC document as evidence that the government has reviewed or approved its activities.
Investors should not assume that the existence of a Form D establishes that a cryptocurrency platform is regulated, trustworthy, or authorized to provide every service it advertises.
The appropriate inquiry is what the filing actually covers and whether the business has the authorizations required for its specific activities.
Cryvenix and the FinCEN MSB Registration
The regulator further reported that Cryvenix filed a money services business registration with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, commonly known as FinCEN.
An MSB registration can be a genuine regulatory filing.
However, FinCEN registration is not an investment license, and it does not constitute a government endorsement of a business.
The information submitted through the registration process is not independently verified as proof that the registrant is legitimate.
A business may therefore point to a registration number without establishing that its investment claims are accurate or that it is authorized to operate a particular financial service.
Washington DFI specifically highlighted this distinction in its warning.
For investors, the lesson is to examine the meaning of each regulatory document rather than simply confirming that a document exists.
The Apex Run Privilege Program
According to Washington DFI, investors were provided with a document titled Strategic Cooperation & Performance Guarantee Agreement.
The agreement related to an investment arrangement called the Apex Run Privilege Program.
Zerivian was identified as the manager, while Cryvenix was presented as the trading platform.
Under the described arrangement, Zerivian would provide trading signals for investors to execute through Cryvenix.
The agreement allegedly guaranteed a 300% return.
It also specified a performance fee of 6% of the net profits generated through the trading signals.
These terms are central to the regulator’s concerns.
A performance-based fee can be part of a legitimate investment arrangement, but an extraordinary guaranteed return is a different matter.
Investors should ask how the promised returns would be generated, what risks apply, and whether the performance claims can be independently substantiated.
Why a Guaranteed 300% Return Is a Major Warning Sign
Investment markets are uncertain.
Even sophisticated trading strategies can experience losses, periods of poor performance, and unexpected changes in market conditions.
A promise of a 300% return should therefore prompt substantial scrutiny.
The key questions include whether the guarantee is legally enforceable, who is responsible for paying it, what financial resources support it, and whether the purported profits can be verified.
A written agreement does not make an unrealistic investment claim credible simply because it uses formal legal language.
In the Zerivian and Cryvenix arrangement, the guarantee was associated with trading signals supposedly executed through the cryptocurrency platform.
Washington DFI questioned whether the profits displayed in schemes of this type reflected genuine investment activity.
How the Trading Signal Arrangement Was Supposed to Work
The purported investment structure relied on Zerivian providing signals and investors executing trades through Cryvenix.
Trading signals generally consist of recommendations about when to buy or sell an asset.
Legitimate investment research may include market analysis, but recommendations do not guarantee a profitable result.
A suspicious platform can make a signal-based strategy appear successful by displaying favorable trade results within its own interface.
If the trades cannot be independently verified, investors may have no reliable way to establish whether actual assets were purchased or sold.
Washington DFI noted that similar schemes reported to the agency often displayed apparent profits without evidence of genuine trading.
The regulator stated that trades in such cases did not appear on legitimate blockchain records.
This does not mean that every legitimate cryptocurrency trade must be visible as a separate on-chain transaction. Trading on centralized exchanges can occur within internal account systems.
Rather, the relevant concern is whether the claimed trading activity can be substantiated through reliable records from a genuine service.
Why Displayed Profits Are Not Proof of Real Returns
A cryptocurrency trading dashboard may display account balances, daily returns, trading histories, and performance charts.
Those figures can create a strong impression of financial success.
However, an account balance shown on a website is only a representation made by that website.
It does not independently establish that the investor owns the displayed assets.
A reliable investigation should compare the platform’s claims with payment confirmations, independently verifiable transaction records, account statements, and actual withdrawal activity.
If the platform reports large profits but cannot demonstrate where the assets are held or how trades were executed, the claimed performance remains unverified.
In the Zerivian and Cryvenix warning, the 300% guarantee and the regulator’s concerns about trading records make this distinction especially important.
The Connection to Pig-Butchering Investment Scams
Washington DFI categorized the complaint under cryptocurrency scams and pig-butchering scams.
Pig-butchering generally refers to investment fraud in which a person builds trust with a prospective investor before encouraging increasingly substantial financial commitments.
The approach may involve personal relationships, online investment communities, educational groups, or individuals claiming to possess specialized trading expertise.
In some cases, a research organization or investment club supplies recommendations while a separate trading platform displays the resulting profits.
That structure resembles the arrangement described in the Zerivian and Cryvenix warning.
However, the public alert does not provide a detailed account of a particular romantic relationship or identify specific messaging accounts used to recruit investors.
Those details should not be invented.
The regulator’s categorization provides context, but the published evidence must determine what can be said about this particular case.
Is Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. Legitimate?
The official Washington DFI warning raises substantial concerns about Zerivian Guild Club Ltd.
The regulator identified an inconsistency between the organization’s claimed history and its corporate filings.
It also described an investment arrangement promising a 300% return through trading signals executed on Cryvenix.
These are important warning signs.
However, a corporate name change or reinstatement is not inherently fraudulent, and the existence of a regulatory warning is not equivalent to a criminal conviction.
The evidence-based conclusion is that Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. is the subject of a documented investor warning involving potentially misleading business representations and an extraordinary investment guarantee.
Anyone considering the service should independently verify its legal identity, financial authorizations, and investment claims.
Is Cryvenix Market a Legitimate Cryptocurrency Exchange?
Cryvenix Market is also the subject of the Washington DFI warning.
The regulator reported that Cryvenix claimed New York operations but did not appear in the relevant New York regulatory records examined.
DFI also explained that Cryvenix’s SEC Form D and FinCEN MSB filings did not establish regulatory approval or legitimacy.
The platform’s association with the Apex Run Privilege Program creates additional concerns because the arrangement involved a guaranteed 300% return.
The available public information supports serious caution.
However, the regulator did not publish a complete independent audit of Cryvenix’s operations or a final judicial determination concerning its conduct.
Investors should not assume that a cryptocurrency exchange is legitimate simply because it presents registration documents or claims to operate in the United States.
What Evidence Should Investors Preserve?
Anyone who participated in the Apex Run Privilege Program or used Cryvenix Market should preserve the original records.
Important evidence may include:
- The Zerivian and Cryvenix website URLs
- Registration confirmation emails
- Copies of the Strategic Cooperation & Performance Guarantee Agreement
- Apex Run Privilege Program materials
- Trading signal messages and instructions
- Account screenshots and displayed profit records
- Deposit and withdrawal confirmations
- Cryptocurrency wallet addresses and transaction hashes
- Any communications with purported advisers or managers
- Documents claiming SEC or FinCEN registration
- Requests for additional fees or payments, if any
- Correspondence concerning account restrictions or unsuccessful withdrawals, if any
The last two categories should be documented only if they actually occurred in the investor’s case.
The public Washington DFI alert does not provide a specific withdrawal-fee demand involving these organizations.
Original records are preferable to isolated screenshots wherever possible.
Do not share cryptocurrency recovery phrases, private keys, passwords, or authentication codes with anyone offering assistance.
Can Cryptocurrency Sent to Cryvenix Be Traced?
The possibility of tracing cryptocurrency depends on how an investor transferred the funds.
If cryptocurrency was sent over a public blockchain, transaction hashes and wallet addresses may allow the transfers to be examined.
If funds were deposited through a custodial exchange or payment intermediary, additional account records may be required.
Washington DFI’s July 2026 warning does not publish specific cryptocurrency wallet addresses or a transaction trail associated with the Zerivian and Cryvenix complaint.
It would therefore be inaccurate to claim that the regulator has already traced investor deposits to particular wallets.
A case-specific blockchain investigation would need to begin with the investor’s own records.
Even where transfers can be documented, tracing does not guarantee recovery.
What to Do If You Invested Through Zerivian or Cryvenix
If you transferred money or cryptocurrency through Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. or Cryvenix Market, preserve the original investment agreement, trading instructions, and payment records.
Avoid making additional deposits based solely on promises that they will secure guaranteed returns or release an existing account balance.
Contact any bank or cryptocurrency exchange involved in the transfers to ask about available fraud-reporting procedures.
Report suspected investment fraud to the relevant financial regulator or law-enforcement agency.
U.S. investors can submit reports to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center.
Washington residents can also submit complaints to Washington DFI.
If someone subsequently offers to recover lost funds for an upfront payment, verify their identity and methods carefully.
How Cyb3rsect Can Assist With a Zerivian or Cryvenix Investigation
Cyb3rsect provides digital-investigation and blockchain-forensics services relevant to suspected cryptocurrency investment fraud.
For a case involving Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. or Cryvenix Market, an examination may begin with the investor’s agreement, trading signal communications, payment records, and platform account history.
The objective is to determine what the investor was promised, what funds were actually transferred, and what independently verifiable evidence exists of trading activity.
Where cryptocurrency transaction details are available, the transfers may be examined for additional investigative leads.
Corporate records and claimed regulatory credentials may also be reviewed to distinguish documented facts from promotional representations.
A responsible investigation should identify the limits of the evidence and avoid guarantees of cryptocurrency recovery.
Contact Cyb3rsect About Zerivian or Cryvenix
If you participated in the Apex Run Privilege Program or transferred funds through Cryvenix Market, preserve the original agreement and financial records.
Cyb3rsect can review relevant digital evidence and assess whether further examination may be appropriate.
Useful starting information includes the investment agreement, trading signal messages, deposit confirmations, cryptocurrency transaction hashes, and any withdrawal correspondence.
Do not provide private keys, recovery phrases, or account passwords.
Contact Cyb3rsect to discuss an evidence-based review of a suspected cryptocurrency investment scheme.
Final Assessment
The July 31, 2026 Washington DFI warning identifies significant concerns involving Zerivian Guild Club Ltd. and Cryvenix Market.
The regulator found discrepancies between Zerivian’s claimed operating history and its corporate filings.
It also reported that Cryvenix’s claimed New York operations were not supported by the relevant regulatory authorization identified in the warning.
The investment arrangement involved a Strategic Cooperation & Performance Guarantee Agreement promising a 300% return through trading signals and a 6% performance fee.
The existence of SEC Form D and FinCEN MSB filings did not establish regulatory approval or verify the investment claims.
These findings provide substantial reasons for caution, although Washington DFI has not independently verified the complaint allegations or reported losses.
For affected investors, the priority is to preserve original agreements, communications, payment records, and independently verifiable transaction information.
